Blog Post
Topics
Air Bag Failures
Amputation Injuries
Animal Attacks
Assault and Battery
Auto Accidents
Aviation Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Boating Accidents
Brain Injuries
Burn Injuries
Bus Accidents
Child Car Seats
Dangerous Highways
Dog Bites
Drunk Driving Accidents
Explosions and Fires
Food Poisoning
Mesothelioma / Asbestos
Miscellaneous
Motor Vehicle Defects
Motorcycle Accidents
Negligent Security
Nursing Home Abuse
Pedestrian Accidents
Pharmaceutical Liability
Products Liability
Recalled Products
Roof Crush
Sexual Abuse
Slip and Fall
Spinal Cord Injuries
Swimming Pool Accidents
Tire Defects
Train Accidents
Truck Accidents
Vehicle Rollovers
Workplace Injuries
Wrongful Death
Recent Updates
July 03, 2008
Fresno Boy Killed in Drunk Driving Accident
July 02, 2008
California?s Ambriz Act Cautions Drunk Driving Accident Offenders
July 01, 2008
Santa Ana Boy Killed in Bicycle Accident Identified
June 30, 2008
Bicycle Accident Kills Rialto Toddler, Seriously Injures Family
June 27, 2008
Man Sentenced to 43 Years in Fatal Drunk Driving Accident
June 26, 2008
Dog Bites Affect Home Insurance Costs
June 25, 2008
Mission Viejo, California Propane Tank Explosion Causes Burn Injuries
June 24, 2008
Lawsuit Filed in Redwood City, California Bicycle Accident Case
June 23, 2008
Operator Charged in Fatal Tracy, California Boating Accident
June 20, 2008
FDA Grapples to Find Tainted Tomato Source in Food Poisoning
Lipsticks Found to Contain Traces of Lead
October 18, 2007
Topic: Products Liability
Ask a woman what's the one cosmetic product she wouldn't be caught dead without and chances are she'd reply her lipstick. Well, as it turns out there might be enough in her little tube to cause serious damage to her health, if not actually kill her. In a recent study, a US consumer rights group has found that several of the most popular brands of lipsticks have a lead count that exceeds the normal.
The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, a coalition consisting of women's and health groups said that the tests conducted in Santa Fe Springs, California involved lipsticks from several popular brands, and revealed that at least 61 per cent of them had lead levels of 0.03 to 0.65 ppm. In a reversal of the "you get what you pay for" adage, the lower priced brands like Revlon were found to have no detectable traces of lead while the luxury brands like Christian Dior's Addict showed higher lead traces than other less pricey brands.
The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics has criticized the FDA for failing to set standards for the amount of lead in lipsticks. The founders of the coalition say manufacturers should concentrate on reformulating their products and making cosmetics that do not contain the toxic substance.
Lead has been in the news a lot lately and for all the wrong reasons. In recent months, millions of toys most of them made in China have been recalled after reports of high traces of lead paint on them which could be ingested by children causing serious long term damage to their health. This new report of lead laced lipsticks is even more worrying because lipsticks are ingested much more quickly, much the same way as candy. High lead levels have been linked to infertility and miscarriages, and are cited as especially dangerous to pregnant women.
Lipsticks are one of the most commonly used cosmetics, something that not too many women pay too much attention to other than in terms of what it will actually look like on their lips. They certainly don't expect their lipstick to cause any serious health problems, and they shouldn't have to worry that something as innocuous as a lipstick tube could contain toxic substances that could leave them infertile.
When a person is injured through the use of defective products, she may be entitled to receive compensation for her injuries, distress and suffering. The California personal injury lawyers at The Reeves Law Group bring decades of experience winning compensation for injured clients.


